Jump to content

Talk:Roger Marshall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requested move 6 October 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 13:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Clear primary topic by usage (96% of pageviews) and significance (US Senator). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support thought of nominating this myself, but was gonna hold off and see how some of the related RMs went. Though, it seems like they're all trending towards moves as ptopics, and this is no exception. estar8806 (talk) 03:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Estar8806: Thought you might have; this is a pretty clear-cut one. Also thinking about Dan Sullivan, an article whose move/pageview history is kind of complicated; also a surprising number of people want the Eastenders character. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion The data is pretty convincingly in favor of the senator for that, only briefly did the Eastenders character outpace him, and not within the last year [1]. Even if a primary topic couldn't be argued based off of raw views (which I think the Senator barely wins), in my opinion real people inherently have more long-term significance than TV characters by the same name, with of course the rare exception. If you want to propose it, feel free. I'll support it, but I cannot say how many others would support it. estar8806 (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.